Nigh Fi
BOOK REVIEW: William Gibson's Spook Country
Human history is the record of Man trying to impose Geometry on Nature.
In the first 32 pages of Spook Country,William Gibson namechecks at least 37 brands and celebrities familiar to contemporary denizens of meatspace. Johnny Depp, Helmut Newton, Charles Saatchi and River Phoenix are among those getting some much-needed and long-overdue publicity.
And Gibson's just starting to get his Cindy Adams mojo going. This reviewer began a tally for the whole novel, but it distracted too much from, well, the reading part of the reading experience. At an average of slightly more than one boldcappable person or product per page, there are an estimated 400 such references between its covers. He only neglected to ask Chip Kidd to design the text a la Howard Stern's Miss America.
Where Gibson could have typed "Japanese draft" or "Mexican beer" to satisfy his readers' thirst for details of his characters' canned hops preferences, he goes one better: turns out they like Asahi and Tecate. Interesting. Similarly, you might expect that his heroine might tote a fashionably-modded laptop. Just so you know, it's a "sticker-encrusted Powerbook." Now that's a relief. Who could root for a PC user?
This surely must have a point, given that Gibson's steampunk cred is surpassed only by his buddy Bruce Sterling. But after a while one gets the icky feeling that Gibson may seriously fetishize the "high-thread count" sheets in luxury hotels and the flawless leather in custom Maybach sedans. Even when his characters go native with a post-denouement breakfast at a greasy spoon, he just has to make the short-order cook a retired chef from the original Queen Elizabeth who makes the best bacon on earth. Enough, Bill: Take a three-month gig with TimeOut Vancouver and get this out of your system.
Gibson is a canny, tactical writer, and so one knows this affectation is neither accidental nor a service provided to the highest bidder, but rather a well-considered plan serving some grand literary purpose. Unfortunately, no such purpose ever comes into focus in the book.
We flatter ourselves that these brands will endure, and that the future will care. Will anyone in the early 22nd Century remember Lego or Starbucks, let alone Pendleton shirts or the Mondrian Hotel? Raise your hand if anyone here in the early 21st Century knows the early 20th Century cultural symbolism of Wanamaker's or the Hupmobile.
Gibson's dedicated fans (including this one) count on him to spin such drossy questions into something akin to gold, or at least a slightly less precious metal. In Spook Country, however, the conceit proves leaden.
So what is the author trying to accomplish with this plethora of proper nouns? Two theories:
THEORY #1: Gibson has decided to become a writer of the moment, not for the ages. He's said as much in interviews, and this theory is backed by several topical plot twists and political jabs -- for example, the question of what has become of the billions in cash airlifted into Iraq by the U.S. But when a writer's anatomizing such meaty issues, it's superfluous to mention whether he's cutting with a Ginsu or a William Henry steak knife. It's understood that this feels that world events have become stranger than sci-fi (a problem identified 15+ years ago by Tom Wolfe in Harper's) so he's hied himself into the present. Call it nigh fi. It's just unfortunate that this feels more like an attempt to capture the attention of niche audiences he may not have reached before, such as the bright young slacksters* with sticker-encrusted notebooks or the ad execs dreaming of Jetstream ownership.
THEORY #2: Gibson believes not only that in the future that explications de texte will be so thoroughly and easily linked, via <a href="http://www.jeremikarnell.com/2007/08/william-gibson-.html">rapidly-evolving hypermedia</a> we can't possibly imagine, as to render the above complaint moot -- but also that people will care enough about his work to make use of that technology. Like the paintings of Norman Rockwell, which painstakingly and faithfully recorded the most mundane details of mid-20th Century life (what kind of shoelaces did policemen wear in 1949?), books like Spook Country may at minimum serve future cultural anthropologists as a useful distillation of Western consumerism c. 2007.
The latter seems the more likely scenario, as it dovetails with the one truly pungent and prophetic Gibsonian idea in the book: Namely, that in the not-so-distant future the whole world will be completely blanketed with site-specific geotags and video which not only show you where you are now, but what was there previously. An art-world character (whom I unfortunately kept picturing as Edna Mode from The Incredibles) explains:
Odile squinted over the rim of her white breakfast bowl of cafe au lait. "Cartographic attributes of the invisible," she said, lowering the bowl. "Spacially tagged hypermedia. ... The artist annotating every centimeter of a place, of every physical thing. Visible to all, on devices such as these." She indicated Alberto's phone, as if its swollen belly of silver tape were gravid with an entire future.
In such a future, one will be able to stand at a spot such as 9/11's Ground Zero with a pair of virtual reality goggles (eventually to be miniaturized into ordinary eyeglasses, and then contacts) and not only be able to retrieve photos of all current occupants of the new Freedom Tower, but also to see the Twin Towers mushrooming into rubble, and the Trade Center under construction in the 1970s, and Alexander Hamilton building New York into a financial center in the 1770s, and so on back through Peter Stuyvesant, Peter Minuit, and the Manahatta tribe cutting the most short-sighted real estate deal ever. (And why stop there, when there are mastadons and dinosaurs and primordial protoplasmic seas for Matt Barney and/or Pixar to render?
To the extent that human history is the record of Man trying to impose Geometry on Nature, Gibson may be onto something here. He posits that avant-garde artists will lead the charge into total pop-historical recall -- with spooks, military-industrial crooks, and commercial interests (represented here by the blessedly fictional wideboy Hubertus Bigend of the Blue Ant ad agency, previously introduced in Pattern Recognition) swiftly co-opting the artists for less-than-idealistic ends.
What disappoints most about Spook Country is that this stimulating prediction -- one on a par with Neuromancer's prescient 1984 invention of Cyberspace -- is not meaningfully married to the other main plotlines of the book. [SPOILER ALERT] A secondary narrative involves a radical, autonymous Cuban-Chinese cell aiming to stop government kleptocrats from getting their hands on a shipping container full of ill-gotten war booty. Here the book reverts to the conventions of "run-and-gun" action/adventure genre, as Gibson skilfully but somewhat perfunctorily steers together disparate characters and mysterious agendas toward a conflagration which creates, at least temporarily, resolution for the principles, if not a new world order of the sort sought in previous books by Wintermute or Herr Virek.
This display of mastery of his craft has more appeal than, say, the advent of a new McCartney album; but not much more. Your heart sinks, knowing that Sir Paul's latest songs will be well-crafted, beautifully produced, and utterly lacking his old instant spark of joy. Gibson is nowhere near as accomplished, nor as utterly spent, as the auteur of both Good Day Sunshine and See Your Sunshine.
Even diehard loyalists should acknowledge that Gibson's books all have basically the same trajectory, for until now it's always been an enjoyable ride: the drip-drip-drip revelation of an agenda hidden from a protagonist drawn inexorably by the tractor beam of a secretive patron into the Death Star of a new reality. Without exception, his books contain at least one scene where the scales fall from the eyes of the lead character -- who, whether male or female, is attractive and rugged and vulnerable and talented and jaded and lost and seeking for a meaning which may or may not be illusory, but at least always winds up being highly lucrative. S/he will come to realize, step by step, that while pursuing some rather enigmatic, slightly desperate, increasingly dangerous mission on behalf of a very rich, powerful and shadowy force beyond the ken of mere mortals, s/he has been a just a pawn in their game. The stated mission will always differ radically from the true agenda.
Readers get to ride shotgun with this protagonist, who is kept always off balance and in motion, while we get to feel somewhat superior as we tick off each clue, one step ahead of the manipulated characters. One can look forward to that moment in each novel when Gibson blows your mind with What It All Really Meant, How the World Really Works, and Where that World is Headed Next.
In this iteration of the once and future Gibsonian plot, the lead charcter Hollis Henry is a former alt-rock cult icon, a composite perhaps of the Pixies' Kim Deal and Sonic Youth's Kim Gordon, who has turned halfheartedly to journalism to keep busy, or something. (It is never convincingly explained why such a figure would want to become one of the ink-stained wretches despised by most great musicians. Think: Bob Dylan or John Lennon shredding reporters at press conferences.)
Yet as with Case and Cayce before her, Hollis gets swept into a vortex of perfidious global intrigue which, through a combo of dumb luck, good instincts and an aptitude for surfing the shockwaves set off around her, leaves her on top of the final heap -- having gained insight into who she really is, where she really came from, whom she should (mis)trust from now on. Phew. Along for the ride are both grizzled
veterans of a pre-internet hacker/intel culture, and insanely talented
youthful heirs to their legacy, to be briefly alluded to in future Gibson novels as legendary figures of the past.
The problem: Gibson has not really committed himself here to making these characters more than placeholders for a certain demographic type or cultural stance. Each of them is consumed with tragic nostalgia: How did my genius grandfather really die? Why did my bandmember have to an overdose? And, will I ever find a partner who understands me who is also really sexy? Unfortunately, Hollis remains an oddly nondescript presence to the end. Though we learn many details of her likes and dislikes and suspicions and memories and desires, she never really transcends her initial character profile. Even the acrobatic young counterspy-cum-keyboard player Tito fails to generate much more than the run-of-the-mill sympathy one might feel for a young hero with an exceptional knack for backflips and rappelling. (What, don't you know anyone like that?)
The action is punctuated with flashbacks intended to tug at the heartstrings. But these have about as much pull as attending a stranger's 20TH high school reunion: means a lot to them, nothing to you. The lone exception is a hapless Ativan-addicted linguist, Milgrim, whose chemical dependency and shabby treatment at the hands of a FBI/CIA/NSA/mercenary handler engenders at least some sympathy for his feeble attempts to shake loose of his pharmaceutical and human tormenters. When he finally does, you're happy for Milgrim, whereas the other characters' successes are no cause for jubilation.
All of Gibson's favorite tropes and trendspotting talents are on parade here. He remains tops at encapsulating the minute but telling changes in our culture. He hits upon striking images, such as a "swarming, glittering ball of red ants" floating together to survive in post-Katrina floodwaters. He observes how "the windows of army surplus stores constituted hymns to male powerlessness." He makes a strong case that our current government's focus on security is really a fixation with control. He tracks the evolution of our built environment with the astuteness of a good city planner. (In run-down Vancouver, he notes how bars "seemed to possess these vestigial hotels"). And he continues to coin new terminology that will of course become part of the real-world zeitgeist.
But no deeper connections between cutting-edge "locative art" and blunt-force spookery are never made beyond the overlapping interest in certain technologies which both find useful. You don't need a spy satellite to spot how the Cuban-Chinese gang's quest for poetic justice will physically converge with Hollis' coolhunt for the next big paradigm shift in digital art, and with Milgrim's strung-out bid to escape with enough pills and cash to get himself back together. Yet that cargo container which magnetically draws them together does not really link these characters and threads any more significantly than people in a teenager's MySpace extended network. Strangely for Gibson, the aggregate redemption of all three of the main characters is less than the sum of their meager parts.
Perhaps he has just become a victim of his own proficiency this time out. He can riff on and plot and predict the arc of our popular culture so well, and has the mechanics of storytelling so down, that it's almost guaranteed that on occasion he's going to misfire. It's allowed; Gibson's credit is still pretty high with his readership, and the more easily-digested nature of Spook Country may go down easier with both critics and a wider reading public. One just hopes the next attempt leaves the reader with more to hold onto than a typical installment of a Hollywood movie franchise. The book seems constructed to require a sequel (The Spook Ultimatum? Spy Hard?) and maybe that next installment will redeem some of these seeming deficiencies.
Like Raymond Chandler, Gibson's clipped potboiler style occasionally flies off into purple flights of sentimentality, and the resulting contrast can either satisfy or feel forced. Up to this point, he's made up for it by unfailingly staking out challenging tech terrain, blazing a remarkable track record of correctly anticipating the next phase of our bit-driven culture. The ability to predict the future never goes out of style, but here Gibson's gift feels more like a fictionalized Wired feature than a true novel.
It's no sin to for an author to try to stay au courant and be popular in his or her own lifetime. Gibson is not obliged to toil in obscurity nor to overreach for the humble immortality of a non-player like Joseph Cornell. Still, one can think of writers who managed to be both highly ideological -- whose characters were stand-ins for various demographic types and philosophical debates raging in their particular age -- and also quite popular. Dickens and Dostoyevsky are two examples of topically-minded authors who transcended the faddishness and specificity of their epochs. Gibson is capable of aiming both high and low, but Spook Country trains its sights only on the knees, not the heart.
* "Slacksters" TM John Cusack and Steve Pink, Grosse Point Blank
Posted on August 20, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/9209/20946629
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nigh Fi:
Comments
Enjoyable review, thanks. Two quibbles, one minor. First, I don't think I'd characterize it as an autonomous Cuban-Chinese cell. The Cuban-Chinese family/cell was repaying a favor to the Old Man, who is directing the action, and definitely not Cuban-Chinese (him being Win Pollard being the hoped-for result by many a fan . . .).
Second, I think that your first theory of why Gibson name drops (he's a writer of the moment) is more likely than the second (he's a cataloger of culture). He's said as much, I think - something about acknowledging that we live in a world of objects, and it seems perfectly appropriate to write as such.
I can understand the annoyance with it, to be sure. Sort of like noticing a squeak in your car, or someone else's nervous tic - if you don't let go of it, it can overwhelm an experience. And counting occurrences doesn't sound too much like letting go, I'd say.
In the end, I do think that books like Pattern Recognition and Spook Country will have a shorter shelf life among the greater population than, say, Neuromancer. But hell, as you say, the man's earned a good bit of credit - I don't see any harm in spending a bit of it.
Posted by: MB at Aug 20, 2007 9:32:39 AM
Excellent review. As always, I enjoyed Gibson's style and ability to create the atmosphere and wonderful images through language, but, over all, it was a disappointment. The caracters do not engage; the plot, not terribly exciting to start with,fizzle at the end. I'd rather read "Count Zero" again; "Spook Country" seems to be a reworked, somewhat grimier, greyer, and flatter version of "Count". I hope that Gibson will continue "All tomorrow's parties" arc; for some reason, that world interests me more. Maybe I'm just an old-fashioned S-F fan.
By the way - any theories why all Gibson's heroines get a haircut at some point of the story?
Posted by: Maya Sienicka at Sep 9, 2007 3:01:23 PM
Excellent review. As always, I enjoyed Gibson's style and ability to create the atmosphere and wonderful images through language, but, over all, it was a disappointment. The caracters do not engage; the plot, not terribly exciting to start with,fizzle at the end. I'd rather read "Count Zero" again; "Spook Country" seems to be a reworked, somewhat grimier, greyer, and flatter version of "Count". I hope that Gibson will continue "All tomorrow's parties" arc; for some reason, that world interests me more. Maybe I'm just an old-fashioned S-F fan.
By the way - any theories why all Gibson's heroines get a haircut at some point of the story?
Posted by: Maya Sienicka at Sep 9, 2007 3:01:46 PM
===A point blank review of Spook Country by William Gibson===
A point blank review of Spook Country by William Gibson
Posted in Uncategorized by chrisbradley on the October 4th, 2007
Let's get started on the best note possible. William Gibson stated
yesterday in the California Literary Review that Spook Country was a
"contractual obligation" and that he started with a "blank page" and
found himself in "varying degrees of distress" during the task of
publishing it.
For every reason stated above, and the fact that it is a dry
uninspired read at best, it is not worth spending one red cent on. His
work has become no better than Steven King's work since the release of
Pattern Recognition in 2003, and he is willing to admit, that he is no
longer interested in writing about the future.
If I were tied to a "contractual obligation" I don't think I would
feel that inspired to write anything particularly new or different
either. Especially if I were aware the Publishers were screwing me out
of a good portion of the profits.
So, with these things in mind, lets talk about the story and the
characters. Brown is a psychopathic failed government agent who is
holding Milgrim hostage. Milgrim is addicted to psychotropic speed
analogs. They are in New York at the start of the work. Hollis Henry,
a pop singer from a band called the Curfew (not far from Curve or the
Cure in name) has had a failed career and is making a last ditch
effort as a Journalist for an Internet rag called the node. Except
that she never writes a single significant word in the entire novel.
The container she ends up searching for is ultimately filled with U.S.
Government Money (literally 100.00 bills) and it is a ruse that makes
her a possible target for a Chinese / Cuban group intent on tagging
the money with Cesium. She starts in Los Angeles and Everyone ends up
in Vancouver at the conclusion. The Cubans main characters are a kid
named Tito and a guy with the Gun to tag the money inside the Shipping
Container.
There is a bit about stealing a Glock from a drug dealer, and that's
about as much action as takes place in the book. The sequence in New
York where Brown is madly trying to procure an Ipod containing data
from Tito is a miserable, uninventive look at Union Square, and
involves automobiles very rarely.
The big excitement in Milgrim's life is getting a haircut and a
Makeover paid for in Washington D.C. by Brown's attache's before
boarding a Jetstream to Vancouver where he appears to lose his mind
completely. Crashing a car in an attempt to kill Tito. At which point
Milgrim escapes, snatches Hollis Henry's purse which contains 5000.00
given to her by proxy from a dead band mate, heroin overdose, who
could have figured? Which lands him in a bed and breakfast having a
nice egg breakfast on his way out to roam the streets.
That about sums it up. There's nothing more to it. It was the most
uninteresting, formula driven work that Gibson has ever written. And
the Locative art and GPS opening sequences with Bobby Chombo are so
lost in the gratuitous waste of language that they are hardly worth
reflecting on. It leaves a big "So what?" in my mind.
I am glad Gibson is admitting that his publishing company is doing him
no good, and I suggest that he continue to do so, and "dropkick the
chihuawa's into the soup." Because they are just like PRADA bags,
trendy, hollow, purchased by vindictive people, and generally bred for
all the wrong reasons.
I am glad I bought the book, but maybe Penguin Putnam should rethink
their marketing strategy before alienating their customers with tripe
that isn't worth the toilet paper it was manufactured on. In today's
world, now that he is the Godfather of Cyberpunk, Gibson could have as
easily signed his name on a bag of old tomatoes, and they would sell
for $17.00.
And he knows it. And he will do it again.
NOTE : ChrisBradley PERMITS THE USE OF THIS REVIEW IN ANY AND ALL
FORUMS, NEWSGROUPS, WEBSITES, WIKIS, and BLOGS - Without Copyright.
This Document is Open Source.
===10 Reasons Not To Buy Into Gibson Mythos===
10 Reasons Not To Buy Into Gibson Mythos
Posted in Uncategorized by chrisbradley on the October 3rd, 2007
1) While Gibson May Have Coined The Word Cyberspace, He Did Not
Construct It. DARPA Did.
2) Cyberspace was good for all of 3 Books. Neuromancer, Count Zero,
and Mona Lisa Overdrive. Every subsequent work dealt with other
subjects - which were based solely on the trendiness of the times.
Virtual Light (Virtual Reality), Idoru (artificial intelligence turned
pop-star), and All Tomorrow's Parties (the homeless problem). Pattern
Recognition (Modern Marketing). Spook Country (Paranoia of the
Government).
3.) I wrote a review of Pattern Recognition that was widely available
to people seeking Gibson's work. A few thousand people probably bought
the work because of it. I didn't receive a single thank you note from
the Publisher of the work. Instead - I have repeatedly been asked to
either stop publishing my own work, or leave their forum altogether.
4.) When I made my best efforts over the course of years from 2003 -
2007 to participate in the Gibson Forum, yes that is 4 years, I was
ultimately harassed, shunned, insulted, and instigated into arguing
with its members. They are a HOSTILE, Unpleasant, Self Righteous
Bunch, With No Valid Intent to Read REAL meaningful posts and respond
in a Non Hostile way.
5. The proprietors had me REMOVED from the forum for responding in
kind. After having spent Several Hundred Dollars on Gibson Merchandise
over the years and invested COUNTLESS hours studying Computer Science
and Artificial Intelligence as a result of his works, you would think
I would have something of a place there discussing the subjects.
6. Their forum patrons, PERSIST in posting hostile materials against
my person, after I have left the forum. I know this because the forum
has no measure in place from me ANONYMOUSLY viewing its content.
7. William Gibson, is not at the heart of the real matter at hand. The
real matter at hand is that he probably signed a contract with Putnam
that prohibits him from doing anything but writing Bestsellers.
Therefore his work is Toned Down and not worth reading at all. It is
Formula Work designed to shift units. He has little or no creative
control over the end result as he did with Neuromancer.
8. A Publishing Company that has No Adequate Oversight over its own
resources and the people that uses them has no business being a
Publishing Company at all in today's world. If they cannot prohibit
users from behaving badly to one another on their website, because
they do not interact with it to a significant degree, then they have
no business running the website.
9. The Pattern Recognition Movie will probably sell a lot of tickets.
Good for the Executive Producer. Bad for Gibson. Good for the
publishers of the book - who hold sway over the Copyrights to it
through contracts, bad for Gibson. Good for DVD sales and Wal-Mart,
bad for Gibson. Good for Leather Jackets, bad for Gibson. Because he
knows its not a real story. Its a story that took advantage of the
9-11 event, just like World Trade Center, which was a cheaply made
story with a terribly mundane plot.
10. If you have any ambitions of being a writer, stay away from
allowing a Publishing Company like Penguin Publishing to contract you.
They only pay a few cents per copy sold, while with self publishing,
not only are you your own boss, but the book is instantly available
internationally, and you get paid up to 2 or 3 dollars a copy. Working
the slave life isn't anything anyone should aspire to.
NOTE: Chris Bradley declares this document Open Source for copying
reproduction and redistribution in websites, forums, blogs, wikis, and
any other form of electronic media, including newspapers.
=== An open letter to Penguin Putnam Group ===
An open letter to Penguin Putnam Group
Posted in Uncategorized by chrisbradley on the October 3rd, 2007
Tiger68:
#1. I am not going to ask you to reconsider lifting your ip ban
because it doesn't matter anyway. I have more than 1 ip.
#2. If I had not been threatened by your members first, I would not
have chosen to respond as I did.
#3. No one enjoys being a) called mentally unstable b) being outright
cursed at c) called a self promoting "troll"
#4. To the people that were supposedly "injured" by my remarks, let me
make this comment, they deserved it.
#5. If Gibson wants to Host a Forum about the US Intelligence Services
aka Spook Country maybe it should be considered that people DO
actively participate by making regular reports to them on regular issues.
#6. I attempted to generate 2 threads, that were of practical use. 1
called 21 Gun Salute, which was a fiction thread designed for that
purpose only. The content was no more volitile than any other
collection or anthology of short stories published in the last Decade.
You chose to suppress it. 2nd - A seasonal / autumn thread - which had
NO volitile content whatsoever, and was actually beginning to make
progress. You chose to suppress it also.
#7. It doesn't matter that you have done these things, the most
important of my posts have been copied to my blog. And WILL BE
PUBLISHED in a future book. You can bank on that.
#8. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. A member
on the William Gibson board literally took my face and attached it to
a sign that said "Narcissitic Personality Disorder." If he thinks its
funny, its not. If anyone has it, it is the entire makeup of your
board who think they are a) self important b) infallible c) allowed to
push drugs through your forum d) allowed to manipulate foreigners in
illegal ways. They fit their own description. Using my personal
photograph without my permission and without my posting it EVER on the
forum, is a) illegal b) an obscene affront to decency c) lawsuit worthy.
#9.William Gibson's future products will not be on my shopping list if
I am not re-admitted to the board. I will take no future action to
purchase any of his endorsed products, enjoy his literature, or give
him any sort of positive review with my peers, limited as they are. I
may even write a negative review of Spook Country and make it
prominently viewable. Because I know it isn't his best work, and I
know it was a tactic to sell books for your company rather than
produce anything genuine or creative.
#10. A word to the wise: Losing me means losing everyone like me -
including newcomers to the community who see it as an open forum,
rather than a CENSORED, ILL PLANNED, POORLY HOSTED, attempt at selling
products and manipulating a market that should have dried up with All
Tomorrow's Parties.
#11. I will not spend Movie theater or DVD money on Pattern
Recognition either, and I will start telling my friends it is a waste
of time. And that it has nothing to do with cyberspace, which is the
God's Honest Truth. From the OUTSET, PR has to do with Marketing, and
I'm sad to say that in writing my review which appreared in VoidSpace
and probably sold at least 10,000 copies of PR - I fell for it Hook
Line and Sinker. Never again.
#12. You don't want to deal with people talking about politics, tell
your author not to write about them. I think Gibson is too far away
from America now to make any sincere comment on what goes on here. And
I don't see him catalyzing a single sincere thought on the subject
from his home in Canada which has become an Anethma to any American
crossing into its borders. Canadians come to our country and criticize
us in our own stores while we stand there and listen to how they are
superior to us. Maybe we should close the borders and cut our trade to
them, and see how the Canadian Dollar Fares, when we stop spending
money to support them. Canadians seem to think that America is going
to protect them eternally and they have it carte blanche to step on
our ideas. I'm here, and I'll say it, we probably won't. And if
something horrible happens in either of your two media centers now,
I'll be laughing from my Border Town which is well secured and doesn't
have any real potential targets.
#13 To think I actually thought I might use Toronto or Montreal for a
site for a future film is now virtually entirely off. I'll have to
rethink the entire strategy. Hollywood has its magic, and so does New
York. Two places I can see laughing very hard when Pattern Recognition
doesn't sell enough tickets to pay back the investors.
#14 You can forget I said any of this - laugh me off - or not even
read it for all I care. But keep this in mind, that aborted thought
you skipped when a) either you didn't reply or b) you replied
negatively will cost you. This draft will be copied to my blog which
gets a considerable number of Keywords into Google, as will any of
your responses, legal threats, or scoldings. I implore you, give it a
chance. Because your company really doesn't need a gaping wound to be
its #6 NY Times best seller.
#15 In case you wondered - Yes I still enjoy gibson, but as I said - I
won't buy another thing, and I will turn on his work like a bad penny
in an instant, if you don't do something about controlling your
internal problems with your community. And from an ANONYMOUS perch, I
will be watching.
NOTE: This work is Open Source. Chris Bradley grants the right to use
this work to Websites, Blogs, Wikis, Forums, Newsgroups, and Newspapers.
Posted by: Chris Bradley at Oct 3, 2007 10:08:56 PM
===A point blank review of Spook Country by William Gibson===
A point blank review of Spook Country by William Gibson
Posted in Uncategorized by chrisbradley on the October 4th, 2007
Let's get started on the best note possible. William Gibson stated
yesterday in the California Literary Review that Spook Country was a
"contractual obligation" and that he started with a "blank page" and
found himself in "varying degrees of distress" during the task of
publishing it.
For every reason stated above, and the fact that it is a dry
uninspired read at best, it is not worth spending one red cent on. His
work has become no better than Steven King's work since the release of
Pattern Recognition in 2003, and he is willing to admit, that he is no
longer interested in writing about the future.
If I were tied to a "contractual obligation" I don't think I would
feel that inspired to write anything particularly new or different
either. Especially if I were aware the Publishers were screwing me out
of a good portion of the profits.
So, with these things in mind, lets talk about the story and the
characters. Brown is a psychopathic failed government agent who is
holding Milgrim hostage. Milgrim is addicted to psychotropic speed
analogs. They are in New York at the start of the work. Hollis Henry,
a pop singer from a band called the Curfew (not far from Curve or the
Cure in name) has had a failed career and is making a last ditch
effort as a Journalist for an Internet rag called the node. Except
that she never writes a single significant word in the entire novel.
The container she ends up searching for is ultimately filled with U.S.
Government Money (literally 100.00 bills) and it is a ruse that makes
her a possible target for a Chinese / Cuban group intent on tagging
the money with Cesium. She starts in Los Angeles and Everyone ends up
in Vancouver at the conclusion. The Cubans main characters are a kid
named Tito and a guy with the Gun to tag the money inside the Shipping
Container.
There is a bit about stealing a Glock from a drug dealer, and that's
about as much action as takes place in the book. The sequence in New
York where Brown is madly trying to procure an Ipod containing data
from Tito is a miserable, uninventive look at Union Square, and
involves automobiles very rarely.
The big excitement in Milgrim's life is getting a haircut and a
Makeover paid for in Washington D.C. by Brown's attache's before
boarding a Jetstream to Vancouver where he appears to lose his mind
completely. Crashing a car in an attempt to kill Tito. At which point
Milgrim escapes, snatches Hollis Henry's purse which contains 5000.00
given to her by proxy from a dead band mate, heroin overdose, who
could have figured? Which lands him in a bed and breakfast having a
nice egg breakfast on his way out to roam the streets.
That about sums it up. There's nothing more to it. It was the most
uninteresting, formula driven work that Gibson has ever written. And
the Locative art and GPS opening sequences with Bobby Chombo are so
lost in the gratuitous waste of language that they are hardly worth
reflecting on. It leaves a big "So what?" in my mind.
I am glad Gibson is admitting that his publishing company is doing him
no good, and I suggest that he continue to do so, and "dropkick the
chihuawa's into the soup." Because they are just like PRADA bags,
trendy, hollow, purchased by vindictive people, and generally bred for
all the wrong reasons.
I am glad I bought the book, but maybe Penguin Putnam should rethink
their marketing strategy before alienating their customers with tripe
that isn't worth the toilet paper it was manufactured on. In today's
world, now that he is the Godfather of Cyberpunk, Gibson could have as
easily signed his name on a bag of old tomatoes, and they would sell
for $17.00.
And he knows it. And he will do it again.
NOTE : ChrisBradley PERMITS THE USE OF THIS REVIEW IN ANY AND ALL
FORUMS, NEWSGROUPS, WEBSITES, WIKIS, and BLOGS - Without Copyright.
This Document is Open Source.
===10 Reasons Not To Buy Into Gibson Mythos===
10 Reasons Not To Buy Into Gibson Mythos
Posted in Uncategorized by chrisbradley on the October 3rd, 2007
1) While Gibson May Have Coined The Word Cyberspace, He Did Not
Construct It. DARPA Did.
2) Cyberspace was good for all of 3 Books. Neuromancer, Count Zero,
and Mona Lisa Overdrive. Every subsequent work dealt with other
subjects - which were based solely on the trendiness of the times.
Virtual Light (Virtual Reality), Idoru (artificial intelligence turned
pop-star), and All Tomorrow's Parties (the homeless problem). Pattern
Recognition (Modern Marketing). Spook Country (Paranoia of the
Government).
3.) I wrote a review of Pattern Recognition that was widely available
to people seeking Gibson's work. A few thousand people probably bought
the work because of it. I didn't receive a single thank you note from
the Publisher of the work. Instead - I have repeatedly been asked to
either stop publishing my own work, or leave their forum altogether.
4.) When I made my best efforts over the course of years from 2003 -
2007 to participate in the Gibson Forum, yes that is 4 years, I was
ultimately harassed, shunned, insulted, and instigated into arguing
with its members. They are a HOSTILE, Unpleasant, Self Righteous
Bunch, With No Valid Intent to Read REAL meaningful posts and respond
in a Non Hostile way.
5. The proprietors had me REMOVED from the forum for responding in
kind. After having spent Several Hundred Dollars on Gibson Merchandise
over the years and invested COUNTLESS hours studying Computer Science
and Artificial Intelligence as a result of his works, you would think
I would have something of a place there discussing the subjects.
6. Their forum patrons, PERSIST in posting hostile materials against
my person, after I have left the forum. I know this because the forum
has no measure in place from me ANONYMOUSLY viewing its content.
7. William Gibson, is not at the heart of the real matter at hand. The
real matter at hand is that he probably signed a contract with Putnam
that prohibits him from doing anything but writing Bestsellers.
Therefore his work is Toned Down and not worth reading at all. It is
Formula Work designed to shift units. He has little or no creative
control over the end result as he did with Neuromancer.
8. A Publishing Company that has No Adequate Oversight over its own
resources and the people that uses them has no business being a
Publishing Company at all in today's world. If they cannot prohibit
users from behaving badly to one another on their website, because
they do not interact with it to a significant degree, then they have
no business running the website.
9. The Pattern Recognition Movie will probably sell a lot of tickets.
Good for the Executive Producer. Bad for Gibson. Good for the
publishers of the book - who hold sway over the Copyrights to it
through contracts, bad for Gibson. Good for DVD sales and Wal-Mart,
bad for Gibson. Good for Leather Jackets, bad for Gibson. Because he
knows its not a real story. Its a story that took advantage of the
9-11 event, just like World Trade Center, which was a cheaply made
story with a terribly mundane plot.
10. If you have any ambitions of being a writer, stay away from
allowing a Publishing Company like Penguin Publishing to contract you.
They only pay a few cents per copy sold, while with self publishing,
not only are you your own boss, but the book is instantly available
internationally, and you get paid up to 2 or 3 dollars a copy. Working
the slave life isn't anything anyone should aspire to.
NOTE: Chris Bradley declares this document Open Source for copying
reproduction and redistribution in websites, forums, blogs, wikis, and
any other form of electronic media, including newspapers.
=== An open letter to Penguin Putnam Group ===
An open letter to Penguin Putnam Group
Posted in Uncategorized by chrisbradley on the October 3rd, 2007
Tiger68:
#1. I am not going to ask you to reconsider lifting your ip ban
because it doesn't matter anyway. I have more than 1 ip.
#2. If I had not been threatened by your members first, I would not
have chosen to respond as I did.
#3. No one enjoys being a) called mentally unstable b) being outright
cursed at c) called a self promoting "troll"
#4. To the people that were supposedly "injured" by my remarks, let me
make this comment, they deserved it.
#5. If Gibson wants to Host a Forum about the US Intelligence Services
aka Spook Country maybe it should be considered that people DO
actively participate by making regular reports to them on regular issues.
#6. I attempted to generate 2 threads, that were of practical use. 1
called 21 Gun Salute, which was a fiction thread designed for that
purpose only. The content was no more volitile than any other
collection or anthology of short stories published in the last Decade.
You chose to suppress it. 2nd - A seasonal / autumn thread - which had
NO volitile content whatsoever, and was actually beginning to make
progress. You chose to suppress it also.
#7. It doesn't matter that you have done these things, the most
important of my posts have been copied to my blog. And WILL BE
PUBLISHED in a future book. You can bank on that.
#8. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. A member
on the William Gibson board literally took my face and attached it to
a sign that said "Narcissitic Personality Disorder." If he thinks its
funny, its not. If anyone has it, it is the entire makeup of your
board who think they are a) self important b) infallible c) allowed to
push drugs through your forum d) allowed to manipulate foreigners in
illegal ways. They fit their own description. Using my personal
photograph without my permission and without my posting it EVER on the
forum, is a) illegal b) an obscene affront to decency c) lawsuit worthy.
#9.William Gibson's future products will not be on my shopping list if
I am not re-admitted to the board. I will take no future action to
purchase any of his endorsed products, enjoy his literature, or give
him any sort of positive review with my peers, limited as they are. I
may even write a negative review of Spook Country and make it
prominently viewable. Because I know it isn't his best work, and I
know it was a tactic to sell books for your company rather than
produce anything genuine or creative.
#10. A word to the wise: Losing me means losing everyone like me -
including newcomers to the community who see it as an open forum,
rather than a CENSORED, ILL PLANNED, POORLY HOSTED, attempt at selling
products and manipulating a market that should have dried up with All
Tomorrow's Parties.
#11. I will not spend Movie theater or DVD money on Pattern
Recognition either, and I will start telling my friends it is a waste
of time. And that it has nothing to do with cyberspace, which is the
God's Honest Truth. From the OUTSET, PR has to do with Marketing, and
I'm sad to say that in writing my review which appreared in VoidSpace
and probably sold at least 10,000 copies of PR - I fell for it Hook
Line and Sinker. Never again.
#12. You don't want to deal with people talking about politics, tell
your author not to write about them. I think Gibson is too far away
from America now to make any sincere comment on what goes on here. And
I don't see him catalyzing a single sincere thought on the subject
from his home in Canada which has become an Anethma to any American
crossing into its borders. Canadians come to our country and criticize
us in our own stores while we stand there and listen to how they are
superior to us. Maybe we should close the borders and cut our trade to
them, and see how the Canadian Dollar Fares, when we stop spending
money to support them. Canadians seem to think that America is going
to protect them eternally and they have it carte blanche to step on
our ideas. I'm here, and I'll say it, we probably won't. And if
something horrible happens in either of your two media centers now,
I'll be laughing from my Border Town which is well secured and doesn't
have any real potential targets.
#13 To think I actually thought I might use Toronto or Montreal for a
site for a future film is now virtually entirely off. I'll have to
rethink the entire strategy. Hollywood has its magic, and so does New
York. Two places I can see laughing very hard when Pattern Recognition
doesn't sell enough tickets to pay back the investors.
#14 You can forget I said any of this - laugh me off - or not even
read it for all I care. But keep this in mind, that aborted thought
you skipped when a) either you didn't reply or b) you replied
negatively will cost you. This draft will be copied to my blog which
gets a considerable number of Keywords into Google, as will any of
your responses, legal threats, or scoldings. I implore you, give it a
chance. Because your company really doesn't need a gaping wound to be
its #6 NY Times best seller.
#15 In case you wondered - Yes I still enjoy gibson, but as I said - I
won't buy another thing, and I will turn on his work like a bad penny
in an instant, if you don't do something about controlling your
internal problems with your community. And from an ANONYMOUS perch, I
will be watching.
NOTE: This work is Open Source. Chris Bradley grants the right to use
this work to Websites, Blogs, Wikis, Forums, Newsgroups, and Newspapers.
Posted by: Chris Bradley at Oct 3, 2007 10:10:11 PM
Post a comment








